An Idea to Solve the Lack of Women Speakers at Conferences Problem

I like when people talk about things that make other people think. The recent conversations about the lack of women speakers at search conferences is definitely making people think, and hopefully looking for ways to solve the problem.

Hannah Smith published a thought-provoking post about how audience feedback and speaker ratings are part of the problem with too few women getting speaking opportunities.

This is probably a dumb idea to solve the problem

I think the responsibility to make conferences more accessible to female speakers is mostly on conference organizers. Organizing an international SEO or marketing conference is not something I have experience with or can relate to, so this could be a really dumb idea, but I feel like one solution could be anonymous pitching.

The conference organizers would have to let potential speakers pitch their idea anonymously, making the strength of their idea the focal point of deciding who they let speak.

How anonymous pitching could work

I realize that speaker’s names and reputations are what bring people to digital marketing conferences. And the after parties probably bring the majority of people, so I can understand that the idea of letting speakers pitch anonymously is a risk to reaching attendance and revenue goals.

But here’s how I think this could work:

  1. The conference organizer creates a landing page for interested speakers to set up an anonymous profile (don’t cookie anybody please)
  2. After the anonymous profile is set up, the interested speaker is taken to a page to pitch their idea
  3. All communication is done through the speaker profile landing page, and all done anonymously
  4. When the speaker’s pitch is submitted, they are told when to log back in to see if their pitch was accepted
  5. After the pitch is submitted, the organizer gets an alert and goes through the review process
  6. By the decision deadline, the organizer sends a message to the prospective speaker indicating if they were accepted or not
  7. If they are accepted, the normal speaker process goes on from there

Why this idea might not work

You may be thinking of a few reasons why this idea won’t work. Before writing this I bounced the idea off of a colleague and they told me it was a little out there. But I think one of the main reasons it might not work is because it would be difficult not to try to determine the gender of the person by what they wrote and how they wrote it.

People are into solving mysteries, so there’s definitely a mystery aspect to the idea of anonymous conference pitching. Maybe it would be too distracting.

Who will pilot the idea of anonymous conference pitching?

I don’t plan on organizing any conferences in the near future, but if you’re a conference organizer and you want to pilot the idea, I’d love to help any way I can. And if you have another idea to solve the problem, let’s hear it.

This entry was posted in Personal. Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://twitter.com/philnottingham Phil Nottingham

    Hey David,

    Interesting idea.

    2 possible issues as I see it….

    1 – When you pitch for a speaker slot, you’re often asked to qualify your knowledge in that area with evidence of your expertise. That’s kinda hard to do anonymously and is critically important in order for conference organisers to be able to ascertain the ethos and unique knowledge a potential speaker might bring.

    2 – A lot of conferences, (and in my opinion the highest quality ones) don’t take pitches, preferring to be fully editorial in their approach to building a line up.

    • http://www.davidmcohen.com/ David Cohen

      Thanks, Phil. Good insights. As I’ve said many times, I think Distilled does conferences better than most, in any industry. And I know you all are sensitive to this issue as well.

      One benefit I can see from having conferences that allow pitching is that it may give an unknown person a chance to get known as a solid speaker and presenter. So maybe the conferences that do allow pitches could consider the idea.

  • http://www.willcritchlow.com Will Critchlow

    It’s an interesting idea. We don’t currently seek pitches (anonymous or not) – see my comment on Hannah’s post about the benefits, challenges and responsibilities that brings us: http://www.stateofsearch.com/female-speakers-in-search/#comment-798995205

    If we did, I’d certainly consider anonymous pitching – I don’t think it’s “out there” at all.

    The biggest downside I’d worry about wouldn’t be the “what if we don’t have anyone famous” problem (that’s easily solved). It would be “not everyone who’s good at writing is good at speaking”. We come up against that *again and again*. It’s why we insist on seeing our speakers speak before asking them to our events (and partly why we run smaller meet-ups to create lower-pressure trial environments). I don’t know how you solve that anonymously.

    • http://www.davidmcohen.com/ David Cohen

      Thanks, Will. And great point about anonymous pitching making it difficult to gauge how well a person can present and connect with the audience. I don’t know how you’d solve for that anonymously either.

      Ever since I attended LinkLove in New Orleans, and from subsequent conferences, I always look to Distilled as the model for how to develop a well organized and meaningful industry conference. I believe your hearts’ are in the right place when you select your speakers.

  • http://twitter.com/hannah_bo_banna Hannah Smith

    Hi David,

    Unfortunately I don’t have much to add in terms of feedback that hasn’t already been said by Will & Phil, I’d echo their thoughts.

    That said, I love that you’ve been thinking up ways to try to help solve this issue.

    • http://www.davidmcohen.com/ David Cohen

      Thanks, Hannah for taking the time to read the post. I believe we have enough smart and passionate people in our industry to get this problem solved. We can lead the way.

      And thank you for being so straightforward and honest in your post. Definitely appreciate that.

      • http://twitter.com/hannah_bo_banna Hannah Smith

        Thanks for reading it and writing this post as a result.

        I’m so heartened by the responses I’ve received – like you I believe we can solve this :)

        • http://www.davidmcohen.com/ David Cohen

          Good to know you are getting more positive response than negative. This isn’t an easy conversation to have, especially without the benefit and advantage of having it in real life.

  • Sunny

    An interesting alternative question is, “Why aren’t there more men at librarian search-type conferences?” While men in the information science field tend to gravitate toward technical subfields like programming, database design, etc., it’s difficult to diversify the industry (which is vastly similar to SEO) to the point where men lead the majority. these are usually the people who indirectly contributed to search as we know it today but are rarely heard from….interesting :)

    • http://www.davidmcohen.com/ David Cohen

      I have no idea because I never knew that there are librarian search conferences. Maybe they aren’t interested? And maybe the ladies in the SEO industry aren’t interested in speaking? Who knows.